Describe how alignment between the values of an organization     and the values of the nurse impact nurse engagement and patient   outcomes.

Due Date:   Nov 18, 2018 23:59:59       Max Points: 150

Details:
Prepare a 10-minute presentation (10-15 slides, not including title   or reference slide) on organizational culture and values.

  1. Describe how alignment between the values of an organization     and the values of the nurse impact nurse engagement and patient   outcomes.
  2. Discuss how an individual can use effective     communication techniques to overcome workplace challenges, encourage     collaboration across groups, and promote effective problem solving.     Incorporate how system needs and the culture of health may influence     the outcomes. How does this relate to health promotion and disease     prevention in the larger picture?
  3. Identify a specific     instance from your own professional experience in which the values     of the organization and the values of the individual nurses did or     did not align. Describe the impact this had on nurse engagement and     patient outcomes.

While APA style format is not required for the body of this   assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations   and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines,   which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student   Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to   beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for   successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Top of Form

Benchmark Assignment – Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection

  1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less Than Satisfactory 65.00% 3 Satisfactory 75.00% 4 Good 85.00% 5 Excellent 100.00%
70.0 %Content  
40.0 % Tool for Assessing the Spiritual Needs of Patients CONHCP: 5.2 Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients show little to no relevance to the experiences of patients. A transcript of the interview is either missing or not relevant. Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present but lacks focus on experiences of patients. A clear transcript of the interview is provided. Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patients. A clear transcript of the interview is provided. Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patient. The tool uses reliable methods for gathering data. A clear transcript of the interview is provided. Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patients. The tool uses effective methods for gathering data that produces the results intended. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
30.0 %Analysis of Interview Experience An analysis of the interview experience shows little to no relevance to the assignment instructions. An analysis of the interview experience is included but addresses a few of the points included in the assignment instructions. An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses most of the points included in the assignment instructions. An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses all of the points included in the assignment instructions. An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses all of the points included in the assignment instructions. The analysis shows a deep understanding of the connections.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness  
7.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format  
5.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 % Total Weightage  

Bottom of Form

 

"PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH UNEMPLOYED NURSING TUTORS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT"

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.