Explain what you have observed and why you believe it is occurring. 

This week’s materials have focused on the emergence of cities—both what is required for a city to thrive (such as a growing population) and what can undermine a city’s sustainability (such as inequalities, diseases, and unfettered population growth). Case Study #2 asks you to demonstrate your understanding of these topics by applying the discussion to the current world population.

First: read the attached pdf.file (linked, above) published by the United Nations Department of Economic and Urban Affairs, titled Living to Old Age: A New World Norm. 

Next: go to the US Census website at: factfinder.census.gov  

  • Using the “Community Facts” search tool, type “United States” and click “Go”. What was the US population at the time of the 2010 Census (which was the last national census)? What are the estimates for 2017 (hint: there is a drop-down toolbar that will all you to change between the census and the estimates)?

Then: go to the World Population Clock at: www.census.gov/popclock

  • What are the main components of population change demonstrated on this page? Consider the graph of US population by Age and Sex; scroll back to the year 2000, then 2010, and then 2015. What is happening to the shape of the graph?

Finally: in 500 words, or more, answer the following:

  • Explain what you have observed and why you believe it is occurring. 
  • Do you believe that this an urban phenomenon only? Why, or why not?
  • Are these trends something to be concerned about? Why, or why not?

For full credit (20 points):

  • Answer all parts of the prompt and engage with the questions in a thoughtful way
  • Use college-level grammar, spelling, and formatting
  • Ensure that your paper is a full 500 words (or more), 12-point font, double spaced, with normal margins
  • Cite at least one course source
  • Make it clear that you have both read, and understand, the course concepts
  • To submit your work, click the assignment link (above) and upload a Word.doc or .pdf file

     

    Septe

    1. O dea sign deve

    Ever rece worl most revea miles the l in old and o perce fifty p

    2. Th dea and

    Fig

    ember 2014

    Old-age de ths worldw ificant m elopment.

    ryone aspir ently fewer

    d survived t recent rev als that the stone: due to ast fifty year d-age, define older per 100 entage point per cent in 20

    he increas ths reflects less develo gure 1. Increas

    dev

    eaths acco wide in 2 milestone

    res to live than half o to their 65t ision of Wo

    e world rece o improveme rs, the perce ed as the nu 0 total death ts: from 22 005-2010 wo

    e in the p significant oped regio se of the perce velopment gro

    Living ounted for

    2005-2010, of soc

    to old ag f all people h birthday. rld Populatio

    ently passed ents in life-ex entage of dea umber of dea s at all ages per cent in

    orldwide.

    percentage t progress in ns entage of old‐a up, 1950‐2010

    g to old r half of a

    marking cioeconomi

    ge but unt e born in th However, th on Prospect

    d a significa xpectancy ov aths occurrin aths at age 6 , increased 2 1950-1955

    e of old-ag n both mor

    age death by  0

     

    d age: all a ic

    til he he s1 nt er ng 65 28 to

    ge re

    The b death the s (Figur signifi increa respe

    3. Wo old-a of ch

    Dividi 64), a of m points in 200 perce to the child-a reduc Nation

    Figure

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    100%

    : A new Septem

    biggest incr hs occurred smallest in re 1). Ne cant increas

    ases were a ctively.

    orldwide th age deaths ild-age dea

    ing ages int and old-age

    mid-age dea s: from 38 p 05-2010 (Fig ntage point i

    e decline of c age death ing child mo ns Millennium

    e 2. Percentag 64) an

    %

    %

    %

    %

    %

    %

    %

    %

    %

    %

    %

    19 53

    19 58

    19 63

    19 68

    w worl mber 2014 N

    POPFACT

    rease in the in the less

    n the least evertheless ses, and th

    about 30 an

    he increase was due m aths.

    to child-age (65+), it sho

    aths change per cent in 1 gure 2). In ot ncrease in F child-age de

    is commu rtality is the f m Developme

    ge of deaths at nd old‐age (65+

    19 68

    19 73

    19 78

    19 83

    ld norm No. 2014/5

    TS, No. 2014/5

    e percentage developed r t developed all regions

    he largest a d 10 percen

    e in the per mainly to th

    (0-4 years), ows that the ed only 2 1950-1955 to ther words, a

    Figure 1, 26 w eaths. The m unicable dis fourth target ent Goals.

    t child‐age (0‐4 +) of the world

    19 88

    19 93

    19 98

    20 03

    m

    1 5

    e of old-age regions, and d countries experienced

    and smalles ntage points

    rcentage o e reduction

    , mid-age (5 e percentage

    percentage o 36 per cen among the 28 was attributed main cause o seases; and of the United

    4), mid‐age (5‐ d

    20 03

    20 08

    65+ 5‐‐6 0‐‐4

     

     

    e d s d st s,

    of n

    5- e e t 8 d of d d

    4

    2

    4. T perc deve of c the the mor

    F co

    For perc from 2005 preva

    Note: T

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

    100

    POPFACTS

    The main centage o eloped reg

    child-age d world. But least deve e develope

    Figure 3. Perce ountries (LDC),

    d

    the least centage of m 34 per ce 5-2010. The alence of HIV

    The boundaries on

    0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

    S, No. 2014/5

    reason of of old-age gions (LDR), deaths, whi the main re eloped co ed regions

    entage of deat , less develope developed reg

    developed mid-age de

    ent in 1950- main cause

    V/AIDS.

    n this map do not i

    f the incre deaths, f , was also ich is simila eason was untries (LD (MDR) (Figu

    hs of the least ed regions (LDR gions (MDR)

    d countries aths increa -1955 to 40 e of the incr

    Figure 4. Per

    imply official endo

    ease in th for the les the declin ar to that o different fo

    DC) and th ure 3).

    t developed  R), and more

    (LDC), th ased notably 0 per cent rease was th

    rcentage of old

    orsement or accept

    65+

    5‐‐6

    0‐‐4

    he ss

    ne of or

    he

    he y: in he

    For perce from 2005- perce non-c of chi per ce

    5. Alt reach differs In 20 perce Greec perce Congo

    6. Alt death accu ages More annua and s regist countr scatte condu child d well, c age d tables

    1Source 2012 re

    d‐age deaths b

    tance by the Unite

    +

    64

    4

    the more entage of m

    34 per cen -2010. The ntage of mi ommunicable ld-age death

    ent in 2005-2

    though the hed 50 per rs remarkab 005-2010, th ntages were

    ce (85%); wh ntages were o (13%), Cha

    though old- hs worldwid

    urate than th . specifically

    ally availabl some develo tration and ries, old-age

    ered years ucted. For th death rates, could be esti death rates s.

    e of data: Unite evision (available

    by country, 200

    ed Nations.

    developed mid-age de nt in 1950-1 main cause id-age death e diseases. M hs reached t 2010.

    percentage cent in 200 bly between he three cou e Italy (86% hile the three e the Dem ad (12%), an

    -age death de, their est he estimate

    y, reliable o le only for m oping count d census. e death rat

    when re he rest of th

    and sometim imated from are then in

    _____________

    NOTE ed Nations (201 e from www.unpo

    05‐2010

    Septem

    d regions aths declin 1955 to 25

    of the dec hs was the Moreover, th the level of

    e of old-ag 05-2010 wor n countries untries with

    %), Sweden e nations wi ocratic Rep

    nd Angola (11

    hs reached timates are es of deaths

    old-age dea more develo tries with ac

    For some es may be

    eliable cens he world, on mes adult de sample surv nferred usin

    _______

    S 13). World Popu opulation.org).

    mber 2014

    (MDR), the ned notably

    per cent in crease of the

    reduction o e percentage lower than

    ge deaths rldwide, it

    s (Figure 4). the highes (86%), and

    th the lowes public of the 1%).

    half of all e less

    s at other

    ath rates are oped nations ccurate vita

    e developing obtained in

    suses were nly infant and eath rates as

    veys; and old g model life

    ulation Prospect

     

    e y: n e

    of e 1

    st d st e

    e s

    al g n e d s – e

    ts

“Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us”
Use the following coupon
FIRST15

Order Now