what three things can you now see as problems directly associated with our “Industrializing Structure for Delivery”?

After reading chapters 1 and 2 of the McLaughlin & McLaughlin text, what three things can you now see as problems directly associated with our “Industrializing Structure for Delivery”? Utilize and support your opinion with research from the text and outside readings.

Your thread is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday, and your two replies are due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Saturday.

I need one Main Post (Minimum 400 words) and two Responses (200-250 Words each)

 

Below are the specific requirements for each part of this assignment.

THREADS:

· Must be at least 400 words.

· A minimum of one source is required (course textbook may be used).

· Citations used should be formatted in APA.

· Should thoroughly address the topic prompt, using citations as appropriate.

REPLIES:

· Must post at least two 200–250-word replies to your classmates per forum.

· Should expand upon ideas expressed in your classmates’ threads by adding new ideas to points that you agree with and/or explaining areas of disagreement.

· Should be posted intermittently throughout the forum.  Do not complete all of the replies at one time; instead, allow for conversation to develop by posting multiple times throughout the week.

· A minimum of one source per reply is required (course textbook may be used).

· Citations used should be formatted in APA.

I have attached the Discussion Rubic as to how the Main post and Responses would be Graded. Please follow every single Instruction. There is a Video attachment too that will help in doing the work

I have also attached the Main post of two students you need to respond to. Please send me the main post as well as the responses

Required Resources:

 

McLaughlin, C. P., & McLaughlin, C. D. (2015). Health policy analysis: An interdisciplinary approach (2nd ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett. ISBN: 9781284037777.

 

American Psychological Association. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (Current ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Iverson, C, Christiansen, S, & Flanagin, A. AMA Manual of Style: A Guide for Authors and Editors Current ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

HLTH 556 Discussion Board Rubric

Criteria Levels of Achievement
Content 70% Advanced 92-100% (A) Proficient 84-91% (B) Developing 1-83% (< C) Not present
Demonstrates content mastery and a well-rounded understanding of the issue.

18 points

 

18- 16.5 points

All posts display clear content mastery, and relate precisely to the assigned topic.

16.49- 15.0 points

All posts are related to the assigned topic, but do not provide evidence of subject mastery.

14-1 points

Posts are loosely related to the assigned topic, and do not effectively contribute to the development of the discussion.

0 points

Does not provide evidence of subject mastery.

Articulates a clear position on the topic with academic support.

18 points

18- 16.5 points

Posts are balanced in their approach to the topic, but provide evidence of a clear, well-researched position on the topic.

16.49- 15.0 points

Posts are mostly balanced, but do not provide evidence of a firm position derived from research or current literature.

14-1 points

Posts show a clear bias, or do not provide a discernable position on the issue. Evidence of research is not present.

0 points

Does not display evidence of individual thought or topical research.

  Contributes to the overall discussion through relevant, substantive posts.

17points

17-15.5 points

Unique contributions are made to the discussion in both the original thread and two responses.

15-14 points

Contributions are made through an initial thread and two responses, but are definitional in nature.

13-1 points

Contributions made are minimal, and are derivative in nature.

0 points

Contributions to the discussion are nominal.

 

Structure 30% Advanced 92-100% (A) Proficient 84-91% (B) Developing 1-83% (< C) Not present
  Grammar and

Spelling

8 points

8-7.4 points

Correct spelling and grammar used throughout essay. Posts contain fewer than 2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.

7.3 – 6.7 points

Posts contain fewer than 5 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.

6.6-1 points

Posts contain fewer than 8 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.

0 points

Posts contain greater than 8 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.

 

  APA Format

Compliance

8 points

8-7.4 points

Minimal errors (1-2) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format.

7.3 – 6.7 points

Few errors (3-4) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format.

6.6-1 points

Numerous errors (5+) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format.

0 points

Notable absences in required APA formatting.

 

Assignment

Requirements

6 points

6 points

Minimum word count of 400 words for the initial thread and 200 words for each response is met or exceeded. Initial post includes one unique, relevant scholarly reference

5 points

Minimum word count for each post is within 10% of the requirement. References to outside sources are included, but do not provide unique insight to the overall discussion.

4-1 points

Minimum word count for each post is within 20% of the requirement. Sources referenced are not scholarly or relevant.

0 points

Word count for each post is not within 20% of the requirement. No outside references are provided.

“Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us”
Use the following coupon
FIRST15

Order Now